So, What Should My Finance Committee Be Doing Again?
It’s a fair question. And more nonprofit leaders ask it than you might expect.
Finance committees can drift in a lot of directions. Sometimes they become a de facto management layer, getting into the weeds of decisions that belong to staff. Sometimes they swing the other way and function mainly as a rubber stamp, reviewing reports without really engaging with what they mean. Occasionally they become the place where all major strategic decisions get made, pulling authority away from the full board in ways that weren’t intended.
None of those are what a well-functioning finance committee looks like.
In my own experience as a board treasurer early in my career, I didn’t have a clear sense of what I was actually supposed to be watching for. When I got concerned about a few things, I overcorrected, asking a lot of questions and creating noise for the staff before I really understood the full picture. In hindsight, I should have spent more time observing before engaging.
When we work with nonprofit boards at Trustward, we often find that the finance committee’s role hasn’t been clearly defined, which means good people end up spending their time on the wrong things. The job actually comes down to three responsibilities, and they’re distinct from each other.
1. Fulfill the board’s fiduciary duty.
The board of a nonprofit is ultimately responsible for the organization’s financial integrity. The finance committee is the primary vehicle through which that responsibility gets exercised.
This doesn’t mean reviewing journal entries or questioning how invoices are coded. Fiduciary oversight is bigger than that. It means making sure the organization has appropriate financial controls, that an independent audit is conducted on the right schedule, and that the results of that audit are understood and taken seriously.
A clean audit is a good outcome. But audit findings aren’t automatically a red flag. They’re often a useful signal that something in the organization’s processes needs attention. The finance committee’s job is to make sure those findings are acknowledged, understood, and addressed. That’s oversight in its truest form.
One thing worth noting: this responsibility belongs to every board member, not just those on the finance committee. I was talking with a friend recently who served on a nonprofit board and had largely tuned out the financial discussions, reasonably assuming that was the finance committee’s job. When I mentioned that she personally carried fiduciary responsibility for the organization, something clicked. Even without being on the finance committee, she needed at least a working understanding of the financials, not to manage them, but to fulfill the responsibility she had already accepted when she joined the board.
2. Keep the full board informed about financial health.
The finance committee shouldn’t be where financial information stops. Its job is to process, synthesize, and surface what the rest of the board needs to know.
That means translating financial statements into plain language, not just presenting a packet of reports and moving on. It means flagging when the organization is trending toward a deficit, when a large grant is expiring without a replacement in sight, or when cash reserves are thinning in a way that warrants a broader conversation.
This is the canary-in-the-coal-mine function, and it’s one of the most valuable things a well-engaged finance committee can provide. Done well, the board gets ahead of problems instead of being surprised by them.
The finance committee can only do this job well if the numbers in front of them are accurate and timely. At Trustward, a significant part of what we do for finance committees is making sure the reports they’re reviewing are structured in a way that actually supports good oversight, not just compliance.
3. Steward the organization’s assets.
Some nonprofits reach a point where they’re holding a meaningful amount of cash, whether from a strong fundraising year, a bequest, or accumulated reserves. That’s a good problem to have. But it requires intentional management.
“We recently worked with a client whose board was wrestling with what felt like a good problem,” says Tyler Bodlak, Fractional Chief Financial Officer (CFO) at Trustward. “They had more cash on hand than they needed for operations. But they took their stewardship role seriously in both directions: making sure the organization had enough, and making sure anything beyond that was being put to work for the mission.”
The finance committee should be thinking about where that money is held, how it’s structured, and whether the organization is getting an appropriate return on funds that aren’t needed for immediate operations. That might mean establishing a reserve policy, exploring higher-yield savings options, or working with a financial advisor when balances grow large enough to warrant it.
It also means making sure that restricted funds are properly segregated and that the board understands what portion of the organization’s cash is actually available for general use. This is often an underdiscussed responsibility. Finance committees tend to focus on the flow of money and give less attention to the stock of assets the organization holds. Both matter.
Putting it together
A finance committee isn’t there to run the accounting function, and it isn’t there to make every financial decision. It’s there to make sure the organization is properly supervised, that the full board stays informed about financial risk, and that the assets under the organization’s care are being thoughtfully managed.
When those three things are working, the finance committee becomes one of the most valuable bodies in the organization. Board meetings get more productive. Financial risks get surfaced earlier. Leadership has a clearer picture of where the organization actually stands.
Looking for more financial insight designed for nonprofit leaders?
Trustward’s newsletter is brief, practical, and relevant.